<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prince Charles in Charge — The Plot Thickens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/06/16/prince-charles-in-charge-%e2%80%94-the-plot-thickens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/06/16/prince-charles-in-charge-%e2%80%94-the-plot-thickens/</link>
	<description>Reflections on art and architecture by TIME critic Richard Lacayo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Did Britain's Stirling Prize Go to Richard Rogers as a Snub to Prince Charles? - Looking Around - TIME.com</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/06/16/prince-charles-in-charge-%e2%80%94-the-plot-thickens/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Britain's Stirling Prize Go to Richard Rogers as a Snub to Prince Charles? - Looking Around - TIME.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/?p=2912#comment-614</guid>
		<description>[...] modern to be built on a site so close to Christopher Wren&#039;s 17th-century Chelsea Hospital. By June Rogers was off the job and the British architectural establishment, or at least those parts of it sympathetic to modern [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] modern to be built on a site so close to Christopher Wren&#39;s 17th-century Chelsea Hospital. By June Rogers was off the job and the British architectural establishment, or at least those parts of it sympathetic to modern [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Rogers Vs. Prince Charles &#124; News Junkie</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/06/16/prince-charles-in-charge-%e2%80%94-the-plot-thickens/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rogers Vs. Prince Charles &#124; News Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/?p=2912#comment-494</guid>
		<description>[...] Prince Charles in Charge — The Plot Thickens Richard Lacayo in TIME Can Rogers seriously hope to get this idea rolling? It will take more than an angry interview in one newspaper. But meanwhile he has moral support from a former UK planning minister, who has been on BBC radio calling Charles&#8217; last minute intervention in the nearly complete project approvals process &#8220;almost feudal&#8221;. To which I would only add — almost? http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/06/16/prince-charles-in-charge-%E2%80%94-the-plot-thickens/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prince Charles in Charge — The Plot Thickens Richard Lacayo in TIME Can Rogers seriously hope to get this idea rolling? It will take more than an angry interview in one newspaper. But meanwhile he has moral support from a former UK planning minister, who has been on BBC radio calling Charles&#8217; last minute intervention in the nearly complete project approvals process &#8220;almost feudal&#8221;. To which I would only add — almost? <a href="http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/06/16/prince-charles-in-charge-%E2%80%94-the-plot-thickens/" rel="nofollow">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/06/16/prince-charles-in-charge-%E2%80%94-the-plot-thickens/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
