<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles in Charge?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/04/08/charles-in-charge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/04/08/charles-in-charge/</link>
	<description>Reflections on art and architecture by TIME critic Richard Lacayo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Prince Charles in Charge — The Plot&#160;Thickens - Looking Around &#8211; TIME.com</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/04/08/charles-in-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Prince Charles in Charge — The Plot&#160;Thickens - Looking Around &#8211; TIME.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/?p=2044#comment-492</guid>
		<description>[...]  Posted by rlacayo &#124;  Comments (0) &#124; Permalink &#124; Trackbacks (0) &#124; Email This   In April I posted a few times about the latest royal architectural dust-up in Britain, where Prince Charles stepped in at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Posted by rlacayo |  Comments (0) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This   In April I posted a few times about the latest royal architectural dust-up in Britain, where Prince Charles stepped in at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Prince &#38; the Starchitects, A Tale of Hypocrisy — Hrag Vartanian</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/04/08/charles-in-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>The Prince &#38; the Starchitects, A Tale of Hypocrisy — Hrag Vartanian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/?p=2044#comment-448</guid>
		<description>[...] Time Magazine: More photos of the Rogers project here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time Magazine: More photos of the Rogers project here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architects to Prince Charles: Butt Out - Looking Around - TIME.com</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/04/08/charles-in-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Architects to Prince Charles: Butt Out - Looking Around - TIME.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/?p=2044#comment-446</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124;  Comments (0) &#124; Permalink &#124; Trackbacks (0) &#124; Email This   I mentioned a few weeks ago that Britain&#039;s Prince Charles had inserted his Royal Self into the plans for a proposed apartment complex in London designed by Richard Rogers&#039; firm. Charles [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] |  Comments (0) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This   I mentioned a few weeks ago that Britain's Prince Charles had inserted his Royal Self into the plans for a proposed apartment complex in London designed by Richard Rogers' firm. Charles [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Digest. 04.09.09. at C-MONSTER.net</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/04/08/charles-in-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>The Digest. 04.09.09. at C-MONSTER.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/?p=2044#comment-443</guid>
		<description>[...] Prince Charles still try to shove old architecture down everyone’s throat. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prince Charles still try to shove old architecture down everyone's throat. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crankyoldwoman</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2009/04/08/charles-in-charge/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>crankyoldwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/?p=2044#comment-442</guid>
		<description>O.M.G. Not again. H.R.H. is a nice old codger who&#039;s good to his Mum and actually has done a lot of good, but there&#039;s no way he should be head of state in the 21st century. When he&#039;s mentioned that he talks to plants, advocates frauds like homeopathy, and sells organic products from his estates at extortionate prices, I&#039;ve wanted to beat my head on my desk. This is my country; we need to elect our head of state - someone who actively wants the job and can represent us in the world without making us look like a bunch of 17th century serfs.

Back to the republic project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.M.G. Not again. H.R.H. is a nice old codger who's good to his Mum and actually has done a lot of good, but there's no way he should be head of state in the 21st century. When he's mentioned that he talks to plants, advocates frauds like homeopathy, and sells organic products from his estates at extortionate prices, I've wanted to beat my head on my desk. This is my country; we need to elect our head of state - someone who actively wants the job and can represent us in the world without making us look like a bunch of 17th century serfs.</p>
<p>Back to the republic project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
