-
ADD TIME NEWS
- NEWSLETTERS
The Market Meltdown and the Arts
On a visit to Tate Britain yesterday I made a point of checking out a small portrait head that's of very little interest as a work of art. It's a picture of Sir Edwin Manton, who died three years ago at 96. It's placed prominetly at the Tate because Manton was one of the museum's largest benefactors, second only to the founder Sir Henry Tate. Twenty years ago Manton also founded the American Patrons of the Tate. (He had moved to the U.S. in the 1930s.) After his death his foundation also gave a major collection of British art to the Clark Art Institute in Massachusetts and a gift of $50 million to the Clark's research and academic program.
I was thinking about Manton yesterday because of the way he made his money — he was a co-founder of A.I.G., the giant insurance company that had a near death experience this week. A.I.G. is still a major corporate member of the American Patrons, but I don't think it will be handing out much money to the arts anytime soon. Meanwhile, Lehman Brothers' arts philanthropy was more focused on performing arts education, but it also had involvements with the visual arts. And of course Kathleen Fuld, the wife of Lehman's CEO Richard Fuld, is a board member of the Museum of Modern Art. The Fulds were frequent donors to MOMA and its collections. I don't know how much of their net worth is tied up in Lehman's battered stock, but I expect they'll be economizing for a while.
As Bloomberg News pointed out this week, if a corporate philanthropic foundation is sufficiently endowed, it can coast for a few years even when the parent is hurting — or even gone. But in all likelihood there's a cold wind about to blow through a lot of museums in the U.S. and elsewhere. In July, when Sir Nicholas Serota, the director of the Tate, introduced a new modified design for the Herzog & deMeuron addition planned for Tate Modern, he described the current fund raising environment as the most difficult in years, and said that if the Tate couldn't raise the projected $429 million budget for the addition — it was only about a quarter of the way there at the time — the new building would be called off. And that was before the events of this week, which have hammered the markets in London just as hard as the ones in New York. At the very least, I don't recommend that he go calling on A.I.G.
In related news, the Boston Museum of Fine Arts announced this week that it had completed the $500 million capital campaign to finance its new addition by Norman Foster. Not a moment too soon.
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- Palin on Oprah: Can You See the Real Me?
- Curb Watch: Seinfeld 2.0
- The Bishops' Line in the Sand
- Motorola DROID review (Verizon Wireless)
- Cell-Phone Bills: Even Economists Can't Make Sense of Them
- 'Expert' Wine Sippers Take Us All for Suckers
- Doug Hoffman Tell Glenn Beck He's Hoping for Miracle
- IA Poll: Culver Far Behind In Battle Of Govs
- Palin Was Against SNL Before She Was For It
- 20 Money-Saving iPhone Apps
- Five Things the U.S. Can Learn from China
- China: Two Die After Swine Flu H1N1 Vaccine
- Obama in Asia: Five Things the U.S. and China Agree On
- How a Bank Robber Became an Antihero in France
- Happiness Paradox: Why Are Americans So Cheery?
- Spain: Teen Masturbation Sex Ed Workshops Spark Outrage
- Manny Pacquiao vs. Cotto: Filipino Phenom Wins by TKO
- Obama China Town Hall: Select Audience, Easy Questions
- Forgotten Australians Remembered by PM Kevin Rudd
- The Meaning and Mythos of Manny Pacquiao













RSS