<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today in L.A. News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2008/01/16/today_in_la_news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2008/01/16/today_in_la_news/</link>
	<description>Reflections on art and architecture by TIME critic Richard Lacayo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: smoothjazzy</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2008/01/16/today_in_la_news/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>smoothjazzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2008/01/16/today_in_la_news/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>But the Jules Pascins and the other &#039;very dubious&#039; artworks are what make visiting the Barnes Collection a unique experience. If the collection moves to Philadelphia it could become just another greatest hits collection.

The Broads may think they have more control over their collection now, but without their own permanent space they&#039;re still going to find it hard to convince museums to show their &#039;dubious&#039; work.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the Jules Pascins and the other 'very dubious' artworks are what make visiting the Barnes Collection a unique experience. If the collection moves to Philadelphia it could become just another greatest hits collection.</p>
<p>The Broads may think they have more control over their collection now, but without their own permanent space they're still going to find it hard to convince museums to show their 'dubious' work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
