Reflections on art and architecture by TIME critic Richard Lacayo.

Today in L.A. News

A few bits of aftermath from the decision by Eli Broad not to donate his collection to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

LACMA Director Michael Govan spoke to the Los Angeles Times yesterday. You can't blame him for putting the best face on things, but I find myself agreeing with a couple of points made today by blogger Tyler Green. First, it's hard to claim that Broad "never changed his story with LACMA" if he did indeed explicitly state in a 2004 interview with the L.A Times that he would be leaving part of it to them.

And though I know that Govan was just musing out loud, it's odd to hear a museum director say he's not sure that it matters whether his museum owns the Broad collection outright or merely borrows, as it now will, from the Broad Foundation that will control it instead. As the decades go by and we get a better grasp of which works of contemporary art are keepers, I would much prefer to have LACMA making the decisions about what parts of the Broad collection are important enough to merit continuing display. The Broad Foundation will presumably be invested for years to come in the idea that all of Broad's collection is of consequence.

This has been a problem with other legacy collections. For years the Hammer Museum was obliged to display virtually all of Armand Hammer's bequest, some of it terrific, some of it very dubious. And as anybody can tell you after a trip to the Barnes Foundation, even that famous collection has its share of misjudged acquisitions — Jules Pascin anybody? — but the terms of Barnes bequest makes it impossible for the Foundation to take anything off the walls. Presumably Broad's Foundation, which will exist, as it does now, largely to lend and circulate his collection, won't be operating with rules as confining as the ones that restrict the Barnes. All the same, a museum, which doesn't need to insist that everything a donor purchased was a tribute to his art historical foresight, is in a better position to make hard judgments.

Then the better news. LACMA has also scored a $10 million gift for contemporary art programs and acquisitions.

And this comes at the same time as the announcement that Zaha Hadid has been chosen to design the new Eli and Edythe Broad Art Museum at Broad's alma mater, Michigan State. This will be Hadid' second American museum. The first, the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati, is an absolute beauty. So why doesn't she get more work in the U.S? The Broads deserve credit on this one.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (1)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    But the Jules Pascins and the other 'very dubious' artworks are what make visiting the Barnes Collection a unique experience. If the collection moves to Philadelphia it could become just another greatest hits collection.

    The Broads may think they have more control over their collection now, but without their own permanent space they're still going to find it hard to convince museums to show their 'dubious' work.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Looking Around Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Looking Around in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
CHRISTINE LINDBERG of Oxford's U.S. dictionary program, on why unfriend was chosen as Word of the Year by the New Oxford American Dictionary; it refers to removing someone on a social-networking site like Facebook

Stay Connected with TIME.com