-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Too Many Stars, Not Enough Sky?
Something of a cri de couer over the weekend by Hugh Pearman in The Sunday Times of London, registering his exasperation over the global frenzy to commission buildings by the familiar roster of architecture stars. I disagree, but I lived through the '80s and '90s in New York, when much was built and almost all of it was middling and worse.
The turnaround could be said to have begun in 2000 in the work of high profile architects, with the LVMH headquarters by Christian de Portzamparc, a Pritzker winner, and with the Rose Center, a glass box planetarium by James Stewart Polshek. Then the Museum of Folk Art by Tod Williams and Billie Tsien upped the ante for intricate interiors. Richard Meier's West Side apartment towers gave Modernism back its good name. Even Yoshio Taniguchi's redesign of MoMA, a building that God knows has its shortcomings, offers, in the three sided exterior courtyard around the sculpture garden, one of the most elegant exercises in Modernist thinking I know of anywhere in the world. Finally, with Norman Foster's Hearst Tower and Frank Gehry's newly opened IAC Headquarters, you could say the bar had been definitively raised.
A whole city of starchitecture might be hard to take, but trust me we're in no danger of getting that. Builders, not architects rule, so mediocrity generally has the upper hand. (You have heard, perhaps, of the Freedom Tower they're putting up where the World Trade Center used to be?) After decades of stagnation we live in a moment of genuinely new thinking in architecture, which may be the only art — the only one — of which that would be true. Buildings by the small, glamorous phalanx of architects doing that thinking are seedbeds of inspiration for cities crammed with dull boxes. I can put up with their designer eyewear and their sometimes imperial manner if they can do anything to turn that tide.
In the Sunday Times Pearman actually looks back longingly on the days when you only got one challenging new building every decade or so. Is he serious?
Add Your Comment:
Most Popular »
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- Is Harry Reid Burning Out?
- How Will Obama Pay For Stimulus 2.1? (or 3.0, 3.1, whatever you want to call it)
- Why Wells Fargo isn't paying back TARP
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- The Health Reform Abortion Wars, Part Deux
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- Economists Growing More Wary of the Senate Health Bill
- Quinnipiac: Obama Gets Bump on Afghanistan
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Time to Give Up the Ghost on bin Laden
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Study: Parents' Sex Talks with Kids Happening Too Late













RSS