<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mass (MoCA) Confusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/07/02/mass_moca_confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/07/02/mass_moca_confusion/</link>
	<description>Reflections on art and architecture by TIME critic Richard Lacayo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: flatfoot</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/07/02/mass_moca_confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>flatfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/07/02/mass_moca_confusion/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s either irresponsible or blackmail for Büchel
to not work with the museum to maintain some semblance of a budget. I&#039;m sure that whatever the outcome of this meltdown artists would have no qualms showing at MoCA, whereas I doubt we&#039;ll see any new Büchel installations in the US after other curators take the artists unreliable actions into account.

Shoving airline fuselages into warehouse spaces sounds great- not so practical in reality.

Give me Vito Acconci any day- his only demand was a cheeseburger when I helped install his work years ago.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's either irresponsible or blackmail for Büchel<br />
to not work with the museum to maintain some semblance of a budget. I'm sure that whatever the outcome of this meltdown artists would have no qualms showing at MoCA, whereas I doubt we'll see any new Büchel installations in the US after other curators take the artists unreliable actions into account.</p>
<p>Shoving airline fuselages into warehouse spaces sounds great- not so practical in reality.</p>
<p>Give me Vito Acconci any day- his only demand was a cheeseburger when I helped install his work years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Young</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/07/02/mass_moca_confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 05:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/07/02/mass_moca_confusion/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t viewed Buchel&#039;s art or sculpture but it has to be vulgarly erotic or misrepresented in a fine establishment like the MoCa and I often visit the MOMa in New York city and that is always an ease to my mind.  I agree with Ken Johnson I wouldn&#039;t have it!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven't viewed Buchel's art or sculpture but it has to be vulgarly erotic or misrepresented in a fine establishment like the MoCa and I often visit the MOMa in New York city and that is always an ease to my mind.  I agree with Ken Johnson I wouldn't have it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
