<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Howard&#039;s End</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/04/02/howards_end/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/04/02/howards_end/</link>
	<description>Reflections on art and architecture by TIME critic Richard Lacayo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:49:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Bradley</title>
		<link>http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/04/02/howards_end/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lookingaround.blogs.time.com/2007/04/02/howards_end/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>We have just spent a day in Cambridge to see this exhibition and it more than lived up to expectations. Two weeks ago we went to Kendal to see the HH prints exhibition. Both of these exhibtion spaces are intimate and yet do not attract huge crowds, so one has the privilege of a close inspection in relative isolation. This seems particularly important with Hodgkin&#039;s work, which reveals so many hidden depths and layers.

If you are in Cambridge, see it and enjoy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have just spent a day in Cambridge to see this exhibition and it more than lived up to expectations. Two weeks ago we went to Kendal to see the HH prints exhibition. Both of these exhibtion spaces are intimate and yet do not attract huge crowds, so one has the privilege of a close inspection in relative isolation. This seems particularly important with Hodgkin's work, which reveals so many hidden depths and layers.</p>
<p>If you are in Cambridge, see it and enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
